| |
|


|
|
Lawrence
B. Morse & Associates
Attorneys At Law
19 Cherry Street, Danvers, MA 01923
Tel. (978) 777-1176 Fax. (978) 777-3104
Email us at attylm@bizatty.com
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Civil Litigation
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
- What are the common disputes between businesses that may
bring about claims under G.L. 93A for unfair and deceptive trade
practices?
Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 93A is known as the "Consumer Protection
Act". It regulates conduct between consumers and businesses under
§ 9, but also has far reaching remedies for resolving disputes
between businesses in § 11. This law prohibits unfair and deceptive
trade practices. Disputes about contracts or unfair conduct in
a trade or business may come under its provisions. Common law
fraud or misrepresentation, such as misstatements of fact in the
negotiations leading to a contract clearly come under the law’s
prohibitions. Mere puffing does not. The conduct between businesses
to come under the Commonwealth’s statute must involve transaction
"in the conduct of any trade or commerce" and take place primarily
and substantially within Massachusetts. There must be a "loss
of money or property." Unlike the Consumer provisions of § 9,
a 30 day demand letter is not a requirement before commencing
a law suit. If there has been no loss of money or property, an
injunction - a court order prohibiting such conduct, may be granted
if the unlawful actions may have the effect of causing such loss
of money or property.
- When do the remedies of double or triple damages and/or
attorney’s fees apply in a Chapter 93A case?
It is such a powerful weapon in the civil litigator’s arsenal
because it provides in appropriate cases where there has been
a knowing and willful violation that double or triple damages
apply. Even in cases where only single damages apply, if there
has been a violation, the complaining party may be awarded payment
of its attorney’s fees by the defending party. While not all contract
disputes come within its ambit, particularly egregious conduct
such as refusal to meet contractual obligations without a sound
basis or failure to pay a bill when it is plainly due can result
in liability under Chapter 93A. An answer to a 93A complaint may
make an offer of single damages, which if the court finds reasonable
at trial, may prevent double or triple damages.
- What are some common business disputes that do not fall
under the business-to-business consumer protection provisions
of Chapter 93A?
As a first test, claims under 93A must be between businesses or
between a business and an individual. Intra business disputes,
such as between shareholders or partners or disputes about employment
contracts usually do not fall under the protections of this law.
On the other hand, fraudulent conduct, untruthful statements,
made to get a party to enter into a contract may well provide
the basis for a Chapter 93A claim. I recently tried a case for
a client who had been provided false overstatements of the income
from a commercial building, including fraudulently created leases
for non-existent tenants to induce him to purchase it. That conduct
resulted in findings of double damages for violations of Ch. 93A.
- Does failure to make payments due under a contract constitute
loss of money or property so as to come under Ch. 93A?
In a recent federal case, Arthur D. Little, Inc. was faced with
a failure of a Korean company to pay bills for services that were
rendered over a lengthy period of time. The court determined that
when one business engages in unfair and deceptive practices towards
another and the harm consists of a delay in payments owed (and
the usual accompanying expenses) there is a "loss of money or
property" establishing a violation under Ch. 93A, § 11. The high
costs imposed are that the damages awarded are not those attributed
solely to the nonpayment but rather may be multiples of the amount
of payments originally owed. When the court made findings that
the defendant company had ordered services without intent to pay
for them and had given no reasons for its non-payment and was
attempting merely to string-out ADL in an effort to force a compromise
or otherwise delay payment, liability under Chapter 93A was clear
and costly. The Court doubled the underlying contract damages
and awarded attorney’s fees to ADL in excess of that figure.
|
|
| |
- What is typically found in the document that begins a
lawsuit, a complaint?
A lawsuit begins with the filing of a complaint by the plaintiff
and the service of the complaint on the defendant with a summons
requiring it to answer the allegations. The complaint states
the names and identities of the parties and often tells the
story of the dispute in paragraphs that make up a statement
of factual allegations. The complaint should include all claims
that arise from the underlying transactions and arrange each
legal theory under a separate count. Each count often incorporates
the factual allegations, and then states the legal wrongs and
remedies that come under each theory. If there are contracts
or other documents that are part of the underlying transactions,
copies may be included and referred to as exhibits. In appropriate
cases, the complaint should make a demand for a jury trial.
Under ethical and court rules, an attorney has a duty to independently
investigate the basis of the complaint to determine that it
is not frivolous or brought in bad faith.
- What does the answer filed by the defendant to the complaint
contain?
The defendant must file an answer to the complaint or face a
default judgment. The answer responds to each of the numbered
paragraphs in the complaint, stating whether they are admitted
or denied or whether the party has insufficient information
to respond and therefore denies the same. It is obligatory to
file counterclaims arising from the underlying circumstances.
Certain kinds of defenses known as affirmative defenses must
be raised in the answer or they are waived. Among the defenses
may be a claim that the claims in the complaint are frivolous
and should be dismissed and attorney’s fees awarded for the
cost of responding to a frivolous complaint. In cases of a response
to a Chapter 93A complaint, discussed elsewhere, it may be advisable
to make a reasonable response and an offer of settlement to
prevent double or triple damages and liability for the other
party’s attorney’s fees.
- What are the common types of discovery used to learn more
about the claims and factual issues underlying the lawsuit and
to obtain proof?
Soon after the lawsuit has begun, attorneys frequently commence
the process of formal discovery of the underlying facts. Three
common tools used in discovery are (1) requests for production
of documents or things, (2) depositions under oath of parties
and witnesses, and (3) requests for admissions of fact. Requests
for production of documents and things require the responding
party to produce all of the requested documents and items relevant
to the lawsuit for inspection and copying. Depositions of witnesses
and parties occur when an attorney serves a notice of deposition
on a party or a witness, requiring attendance, usually at the
attorney’s office, of his or her deposition at which the attorney
questions the witness about the case. The witness is under oath
and testimony is recorded by a court stenographer or sometimes
by videotape. The deposition provides not only factual material
for the prosecution or defense of a lawsuit, but also preserves
testimony should the witness later be unavailable. Each party
besides the calling party has the right to cross-examine. Depositions
allow attorneys for the parties to weigh the credibility and
demeanor of the witnesses and to determine how strong they may
be as a witness at trial. Witness may have their own counsel
present. Often cases settle after depositions have been taken
since at that point the parties have attended the depositions
with their attorneys and have a fairly good idea as to the strengths
and weaknesses of the lawsuit. Finally, it may make sense to
ask the opposing party to admit to facts and the identity of
documents to ease their presentation at trial. These are numbered
statements of fact or of the identity and genuineness of documents
to which a party must either admit or deny, and if admitted,
these are established for purposes of trial.
- What are written interrogatories to parties and how do
they assist in the discovery of the facts of a case?
Another tool that is used in the discovery process is the service
upon other parties of written interrogatories to be answered
under oath by the party or an agent, officer, or employee of
the party. Like other discovery, interrogatories often seek
to identify the factual basis of a party’s claims or defenses.
They may also inquire as to the facts known and opinions held
by experts. Thus, a party may find out what experts the other
party intends to call as witnesses at trial, what is the subject
matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and the substance
of facts and opinions relied upon
-
How does an attorney conduct a trial and
use the results of discovery?
A trial, as is commonly known from TV and film depictions,
involves first opening statements of counsel for the parties,
then the presentation of the cases of each of the parties,
and finally closing arguments. A good trial attorney gives
considerable thought to the order in which he calls witnesses
and how to present evidence in an interesting and compelling
way to the trier of facts, whether a judge or the jury, or
sometimes with some claims tried by the judge and others decided
by the jury. Each witness is called and examined under oath
by the calling party and then is subject to cross-examination
by the opposing party which may seek to clarify or undermine
the witness’s testimony. Leading questions, questions which
suggest the answer, may be used on cross examination and can
be a very effective tool. If a witness contradicts testimony
in a deposition, the testimony in the deposition may be used
to contradict the witness on the stand. If a witness is unavailable
at trial, the deposition testimony may be used. The rules
of evidence govern the admission of evidence, and the attorney
must be familiar with what constitutes hearsay testimony and
exceptions to it as well as numerous other rules of evidence
and procedure. Objections at trial must be timely made or
waived.
- What are the rules of civil procedure and how do they
govern a lawsuit?
All of the above parts of the anatomy of a lawsuit are governed
by the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure. These are some
85 rules that govern everything from the service of a complaint,
the way in which complaints and answers are drafted, how discovery
is conducted, how trials are regulated, and the form of judgment
and various kinds of relief including injunctions or restraining
orders, and proceedings for civil contempt for violation of
the same.
|
|
| |
Statutes of Limitations, as the deadlines for bringing lawsuits,
must be observed unless there are some circumstances suspending
the deadline. Various claims have different deadlines for bringing
a claim in court or in the agency where the claim may have to
be filed first. The deadline runs from the time the claim or cause
of action “accrues.” This generally means the earliest time
from which the person having the claim knew or should have known
that he or she had a claim. In one case involving a breach
of contract (6 years), fraud (3 years) and violations of Ch. 93A
(the consumer Protection Act, 4 years), the Court stated that
“ We conclude that the triggering event cannot be pinpointed as
matter of law, but poses a question of fact as to when a reasonable
policy holder should have realized from the available information
that the policy was not performing as allegedly promised and that
the so-called vanishing premiums were a fiction. ‘In most
instances, the question when a plaintiff knew or should have known
of its cause of action is one of fact that will be decided by
the trier of fact.’”
Until recently, claims for employment discrimination had to be
filed with the Massachusetts
Commission Against Discrimination within six months of the
last act constituting discrimination. Legislation was passed
in 2002 increasing the statute of limitations to 300 days.
Most tort claims such as fraud, personal injuries such as
medical or legal malpractice, assault, injuries caused by a fall
or car accident, libel or defamation have a deadline of
3 years. Claims against the executor of an estate have to
be brought within a year of the appointment of the executor or
other fiduciary such as a trustee. Breaches of contract must be
brought within 6 years unless the contract has some other term.
As indicated above, the Consumer Protection Act requires the actions
be brought within 4 years. There are some very short
appeal periods. An appeal from an Order of Condition of
a local Conservation Commission under the Wetlands Protection
Act to the Department of Environmental Protection must be taken
within 10 days. An appeal from a decision of a City
or Town’s Zoning Board of Appeal or other permit-granting
authority regarding a variance or special permit must be appealed
within 21 days.
There are circumstances that suspend or toll the statute of limitations.
Dishonest or fraudulent concealment of the right to sue by the
wrongdoer will suspend the deadline an amount of time equal to
the period of concealment. Disability of the victim or the
victim being underage will hold off the deadline until that status
ends. There are other circumstances that may impact the determination
such as lack of circumstances for discovery of the right to sue.
Thus, whenever a question arises of whether the deadline has passed,
a lawyer should be consulted. Never should it be assumed
that circumstances cannot be found that may excuse the missing
of a deadline. A lawyer’s having missed the deadline is one of
the most common grounds for lawyer malpractice claims.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Please Note:
The materials in this advisory should not be relied upon
in making decisions about your personal situation. Competent
professional advice concerning your individual situation is
essential. |
|
|
Copyright© 2000 to the present year, Lawrence B. Morse
Please See our Disclaimer Concerning
Reliance on these Materials.
www.BizAtty.com
[top]
|
|